Moscow Arbitration court agreed with the position of YUKO lawyers and recognized the lease agreements between the Debtor and third-party organization as fictitious (void). These agreements were signed with the affiliated company, belonging to the one group of companies, without the agreement of the pledge holder. In fact, this company was a transit link created to obtain an external legal basis for the withdrawal of income from the use of the property out of control of the pledge holder and bankruptcy trustee.
The team of the YUKO law firm defended the interes...Read more
The plaintiffs filed claims in the amount of 50.84...Read more
Leaders in the rating of legal services of the publishing house Kommersant (2022)
Market research services for wealthy clients and business owners by Pravo RU (2022)